Incidence and Predictors of Outcome in the Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis with Drug-Eluting Balloons
- Associate Physician Of Cardiology. Federal Govt Polyclinic (PGMI) Islamabad.
- Physician Cardiologist/ Assistant Professor of Cardiology Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI) Islamabad.
- Associate Professor Dept of Cardiology Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad
- Associate Physician of Cardiology. Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI) Islamabad
- Assistant Executive Director Federal Government Polyclinic (PGMI) Islamabad
- Medical Officer Cardiology. Federal government Polyclinic (PGMI) Islamabad
Abstract
In-stent restenosis (ISR) continues to pose a significant clinical challange after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), despite the use of drug-eluting stents (DES). Drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) have surfaced as a promising therapeutic solution for ISR, offering a non-stent-based approach to administer antiproliferative drugs directly to the vessel wall. This study aims to evaluate the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and identify clinical and procedural predictors of outcomes in patients undergoing DEB treatment for ISR.
Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study conducted at Pakistan Institute of Medical science, Islamabad, during study period from July 2022 to July 2023. All patinets with age ?18 years, angiographically confirmed restensosis were included.
Results: A total of 264 patients were included in the study majority male (73.86%), with a mean age of 61.42± 9.74 years. Procedural success of 99.24% was achieved, and of patients within the 12-month. The cumulative incidence of MACE was 8% at 12 months with diabetes mellitus (HR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.2, p<0.01), stent length >20 mm (HR: 1.7, 95% CI: 1.0-2.8, p<0.05), and suboptimal stent expansion (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.7-4.8, p<0.01). Moreover, age more than 65 years and multiple vessel disease were significant predictors of MACE. KM analysis revealed significantly higher ISR and lower MACE-free survival in patients with DM and longer stent (p<0.01 and p<0.05, respectively).
Conclusion
In conclusion, the use of DEBs in the treatment of ISR shows a good procedural success rate along with a controllable restenosis recurrence rate. Significant predictors of unfavorable outcomes, such as diabetes mellitus, stent length, and poor stent expansion, were identified
Keywords: coronary artery disease, In-stent restenosis drug-eluting balloons, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Metrics
Full Text
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Abdul Wahab, Maria Shehzad, Naveed Yaqoob, Fazal ul Aziz, Farrukh Iqbal, Muhammad Zarar Khan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.