Comparative Effectiveness of the Oral versus Topical Ofloxacin to Reduce the Discharge in Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media: A Randomized Control Trial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48036/apims.v20iSUPPL-1.945Abstract
Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the reduction rate of discharge in chronic suppurative otitis media with the use of oral vs topical Ofloxacin.
Methodology: It was a randomized control trial conducted in the Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck surgery PIMS Islamabad from 26-06-2019 to 26-12-2019. The study was commenced with the approval from the ERB (Ethical Review Board). Non-probability consecutive sampling technique was used. Sample size was calculated using WHO calculator which was 98 with 49 patients in each group A & B. Participants of group A received topical Ofloxacin whereas, in group B received oral/systemic Ofloxacin. Efficacy of oral and topical drug was compared after two weeks of the start of the treatment. Data analysis was done using SPSS version 23.
Results: According to gender distribution, there were 67.3% (n=33) males and 32.7% (n=16) were females in group A whereas, there were 61.2% (n=30) males and 38.8% (n=19) were females in group B. The mean age of the participants of group A was recorded as 27.0 years ± 9.4 and 26.6 years ± 10.1 in group B. Mean disease duration in group A was recorded as 2.6 years ± 2.1 and 2.4 years ± 1.9 in group B. A pus discharge was recorded in 73.5% (n=36) patients, pus and blood stained discharge in 26.5%, (n=12), 89.8% (n=44) had redness and 12.2% (n=6) had edema on examination. The values for group B were 95.9% (n=47), 4.1% (n=2), 46.9% (n=23) and 6.1% (n=3), respectively. After two weeks treatment, the outcomes were considerably enhanced in patients treated with topical ofloxacin in comparison to those treated with oral ofloxacin (p<0.05 across all groups).
Conclusion: Topical ofloxacin is a better agent as compared to orally available in resumption of discharge in CSOM. More, multicenter studies with an enlarged sample size are suggested to strengthen the evidence.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Amir Masaud, Momina Zeb, Sadaqat Momand

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.